id ans11 ans12 ans13 ans14 ans15 comment1 ans21 ans22 ans23 ans24 ans25 ans26a ans26b ans26c time comment2 ans31 ans32 ans33a ans33b ans34 comment3 ans41 finalComment submitTime Real submitTime submitDayExcel
4 computer no no T T T F F E T n 11.21 confusing search,ranking,pdf other:not sure own,online,offline,webServices google favourably pleasant layout
5 computer no no no The choices are not as complete as needed. (especially 1.1) T T T T T X F n 19 We are not references,citing,cociting,citations exaplanations own choose Favourable, we'll use it next time provided that more explicit explanations are offered. results The questions are quite comprehensive & concise.
6 computer no no no T T T T T N F n 10 this exerc ranking,citing,cociting interface own,webServices google favourably pretty good with features on cocitation etc... results
7 physicist daily regular,links no seems simple enough T T T T T X T n 15 ranking,citing,cociting exaplanations own,online,webServices spires favourably results,exercise
8 physicist regularly regular,links no T T T T T X T n 14 ranking,references,citing,cociting webServices web services veryFovourably results,exercise
10 physicist regularly regular,alertsarXiv,links yes T T T T T E F n 5 a lot of t ranking,references,citing,cociting interface own,online,offline unfavourably Citebase isn't quite as complete or comprehensive as,  say,  INSPEC,  at this point. results,exercise 07- 02 July 02, 2002, 3:08:33 July 02 07- 02
11 other:Information manager occasionally web yes arc In 1.5 may need to be clearer on the difference between OAI services and ePrints. I havered over mentioning using our own ePrints server... T T T F T E T n 15 The Co-citing question was the hardest and needed quite a bit of ferreting around. The site is very weak in explanations on what is possible. Perhaps experts would know what they were doing but for me this was very difficult. ranking,pdf,references exaplanations online zetoc favourably exercise 07- 04 July 04, 2002, 15:57:33 July 04 07- 04
12 mathematician regularly regular,web yes T T T T T E T y 23 I used the search in 2.6b but it was unsuccessful.  I ended up looking for ref[57] in the PDF document and clicking the link from there. search faster favourably 07- 05 July 05, 2002, 15:15:39 July 05 07- 05
13 infoScience no yes F F T F F F F y 4 Don't understand it. The words "most cited" don't appear on the results page so I end up guessing. cociting exaplanations choose 07- 05 July 05, 2002, 15:34:35 July 05 07- 05
14 infoScience no yes T T T T T E F n 10 Lack of familiarity with the structure of Citebase made this difficult in a hurry and I felt very unconfident - but unwilling to waste time making myself more confident.   choose I don't work closely enough in the area of information retrieval to give opinions on remaining sections. 07- 05 July 05, 2002, 16:05:16 July 05 07- 05
15 infoScience no yes T T T T T E T n 32 I think I lot of people were trying this at the same time so that complete pages did not appear. This led to much puzzlement as I did not understand where one could get the citing information, until the full page came up pdf,citing,cociting coverage online,webServices Medline favourably results,exercise Good idea but led to confusion becuase of too many people trying it at one time 07- 05 July 05, 2002, 16:57:09 July 05 07- 05
16 infoScience no yes T F T F T F F n 20 Not easy. Help documentation failed to help me in most cases. Although I understand in general the value of these citation analyses, it is not something that I do in practice. Therefore, this set of exercises was difficult to follow.



It is not clear wh		   exaplanations own,online,webServices veryFovourably I chose not to respond to 3.1 because it is not possible for me to choose among these. They all seem useful to me. results,exercise 07- 06 July 06, 2002, 17:02:14 July 06 07- 06
17 computer no no F T T T T E T y 6 Your questions to easily lead to the answers.  That is, you use the terminology that is used on the site in your questions.  This is too leading and thus poor experimental design. pdf,references,citing,cociting interface Melvyl (Inspec) favourably You need to bring in user interface specialists to improve what you have. I'm sure the underlying technology is quite impressive. 07- 06 July 06, 2002, 19:35:44 July 06 07- 06
18 other:Librarian no no T T T T T E T n 16 You need clear definitions of your terms in standard English. 'Author hits', and 'Paper Hits' have no meaning for me. I'm not sure what you mean by hits, this should be made quite clear to all users.

Part of the time taken was used to scratch my head whi		 search,pdf,citing exaplanations online,offline,webServices Medline favourably If it was clear (to me) what the database was doing then it would be quite useful for searching, and finding seminal papers in a field.

Ideally it would have a controlled vocabulary so that every article on a particular topic would have the same subject 		results,exercise 07- 08 July 08, 2002, 4:26:24 July 08 07- 08
19 infoScience occasionally library yes T T T T T N T y 21 Had problems downloading pdf for 2.6a but maybe it's my PC as we've had some updates done to it recently and there have been a few bugs. Spent about ten minutes with a frozen computer. ranking,pdf,references,citing papers online,webServices most for what? In own field LISA favourably The search options don't seem particularly powerful and I can imagine there being problems finding some things within these limits.  However, overall it is an excellent idea. results,exercise 07- 08 July 08, 2002, 9:52:40 July 08 07- 08
20 infoScience no yes Can links to the various OAI initiatives/services be included so users can go off and explore? T T T T T E T n 9 Fascinating ability to cross-check links between papers, though I would need more practice to not be confused as to where I was!  It seems very easy to wander off down a track (very useful and interesting in its own right), but forget where you started fr ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting other:method for keeping track of search/browse pa   favourably Very clever and valuable resource.  May need some training or a good guide to get the most from it. results,exercise Well-thought out interactive test, although I'm itching to check whether I found the right articles now! 07- 08 July 08, 2002, 10:22:33 July 08 07- 08
21 other:Research Librarian no no T T T T T E T n ? I missed that I was supposed to time it. Other comments - interesting, but then I don't know if I interpreted the categories correctly and therefore got the correct answers.
 pdf,references,citing,cociting other:more refined search capabilities online Scisearch, Social SciSearch favourably If this project goes forward, please think about strenthening the search functions.  i.e. knowing that string theory finds papers that contain the word string AND the word theory is nice, but in a large database much to broad an option unless you're reall results,exercise 07- 08 July 08, 2002, 15:23:16 July 08 07- 08
22 physicist occasionally yes T T T T T E F n 19 citing,cociting coverage webServices google favourably 07- 08 July 08, 2002, 17:39:15 July 08 07- 08
23 other:Librarian no no yes T T T T T E T n 10 minutes Not bad. I didn't even need to use any explanations.  I did have a little problem with the articles citing the first article, but I think I got it right. references,citing papers veryFovourably 07- 08 July 08, 2002, 17:59:00 July 08 07- 08
25 other:librarian no no yes T T T T T E T n 9 cociting choose 07- 09 July 09, 2002, 20:14:19 July 09 07- 09
26 computer no yes T T T F N N N 5 choose Too long an exercise and questionnaire for casual testers 07- 09 July 09, 2002, 23:20:50 July 09 07- 09
27 other:Librarian occasionally web yes arc,myOAI T T T T T E T n 25 ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting coverage online Library and IS Abstracts favourably results,exercise 07- 10 July 10, 2002, 7:28:00 July 10 07- 10
28 computer occasionally web yes T T T T T E T n 4:45 ranking,pdf,citing links own favourably results,exercise 07- 10 July 10, 2002, 9:28:08 July 10 07- 10
29 infoScience no no no T T T F T N F n 6 Not easy! pdf,references,citing,cociting exaplanations online,offline,webServices OLIS veryFovourably Probably not much use inmy area - ornithology, bibliographic research pre-computer days 07- 10 July 10, 2002, 12:56:00 July 10 07- 10
30 other:Biologist no no no Why are there no biologist or chemist options in Q.1.1? There is much more to science that those listed, especially as this century is being hailed as the Century of Biology. T T T F F F F n 8.41 There were by no means sufficient help files to assist with the simple solving of the questions posed. I got frustrated trying to work out what I was supposed to be doing and lost interest. You are going to have to make this a lot more user friendly befor   exaplanations choose See above A waste of my time. 07- 10 July 10, 2002, 13:33:33 July 10 07- 10
31 other:Info professional no no yes myOAI T T T N N E T y 9 choose results,exercise 07- 11 July 11, 2002, 20:02:05 July 11 07- 11
32 infoScience regularly links yes T T T T T X T n 11 search,ranking exaplanations online,offline unfavourably 07- 11 July 11, 2002, 20:59:22 July 11 07- 11
33 infoScience no yes kepler,myOAI T T T T T E F n 12 It took a while to figure out how to use the interface, but after I had it was fairly straight forward. ranking,pdf,references,citing exaplanations online,offline,webServices ProQuest favourably With better explanations and an improved interface this would be an excellent service. results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 5:49:06 July 12 07- 12
34 other occasionally library yes T T T T T X T n 20 ranking,references,citing,cociting interface own,online,webServices choose 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 13:25:55 July 12 07- 12
35 other:librarian occasionally regular,library yes arc,myOAI T T T F F E T n 14 i'm not familiar with this citation business, didn't understand Q 2.4 & 2.5 search,pdf,citing,cociting links choose results 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 13:38:10 July 12 07- 12
36 infoScience no no yes T T T T T E T n 11 Would have been slightly quicker to complete if the subjects of the questions

came in the same order as the citations themselves e.g. asking about co-cited

papers after top 5 citing articles.		 search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting other:Explanations in a more obvious place e.g. a   n/a choose Great to have this facility for eprints - might make people more happy to use them

which would be a good thing!		 results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 16:10:30 July 12 07- 12
37 other:sociologist no no yes kepler T T T F F E T n 13 had difficulty with 2.4 and 2.5 -- could be I wasn't clear on how to actually coomplete them with Citebase search,ranking,pdf,citing,cociting exaplanations online,webServices own web page veryFovourably looks great -- would love to see something similar in the human sciences results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 16:11:21 July 12 07- 12
38 other:information manager no yes as usual, I find myself an "outsider" in discussions of things that will be important to me very soon. I find there is no category for me to go into. You guys need to look beyond geekdom to think about ordinary social scientists, librarians, educationists T T T T N N N stopped af these questions start to depend on success in understanding earlier questions - and are therefore not good discriminators. I became impatient with the exercise, partly because such questions are of little interest in the fields where I have done research references,citing other:more precision in indexing and therefore sea webServices British Education Index unfavourably its purposes are unfamilar to me. I am interested in subject matter, methodological approach and scale, but not with citations. results the impact on reseach activity of the existence of such services is not necessarily benign, and will include things that are distinctly harmful. An attempt to reduce seniority rankings to numbers will have concomittant results on the quality of the resear 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 16:22:01 July 12 07- 12
39 infoScience no yes myOAI T T T T T E T n citing,cociting own favourably 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 16:37:00 July 12 07- 12
40 other:sociologist no yes N N N N N N N choose 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 17:54:08 July 12 07- 12
41 infoScience occasionally regular yes arc,kepler,myOAI T F T T T E T y 12 1. A search in "all metadata fields" or fulltext might be helpful.

2. The identifier search uses exact match, it might be too restrictive. For example, it should work if I search "hep-th/9711053"		 ranking,references links own choose 1. After search, the number in front of matched articles is a bit confusing, it has different meanings based on ranking criteria.

2. I used researchindex.com a lot. The interface is not as simple as researchindex. After all, the critical one is number of		 results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 18:11:53 July 12 07- 12
42 other:Health scientist occasionally web yes arc,kepler Doesn't ask whether or not I have any papers in arXiv, and, if so, approximately how many (I have only one).

 T T T T T F T y 16 The main time delay was finding that I needed to use semicolons to separate the names of multiple authors.

 search,ranking,citing other:Ability to extract reference lists from pape online,webServices PubMed favourably A very interesting service! results,exercise Required about 25-30 minutes total
 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 18:53:18 July 12 07- 12
43 other:librarian regularly regular yes T F F F F F F n five This is an interesting test.  I must have in haste gone astray someplace as I failed to be led to the Strominger and Witten ref. search,citing,citations interface web of science and google favourably results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 19:13:50 July 12 07- 12
44 computer regularly links no N N N N N N N references,citing,cociting papers Research Index favourably You don't really expect people to do the practical exercise do you?

 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 22:44:24 July 12 07- 12
45 other:Cognitive Neuroscientist no yes T T F T T E T n 7 I had some early confusion finding the citing articles and co-cited articles. I am

accustomed to using the ISI Web of Knowledge system which lays things out slightly

differently. This works just as well once you know where everything is, though.		 search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting,citations other:The index page generated by a search could g own,online,webServices ISI Web of Science choose results,exercise This was very interesting. I look forward to seeing functionality like this on the

Cogprints archive.		 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 23:00:08 July 12 07- 12
46 mathematician no no no T T T F F F F n 45 This in not intuitively obvious. search,ranking,pdf,references,citing exaplanations online,offline,webServices PubMed favourably It's a good idea. Since it is so slow, I shall probably use it only for special situations. results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 23:00:57 July 12 07- 12
47 other:Physics teacher no yes T T T T T F T n 25 The thing that caused most delay was getting the answer to 2.4. As I was looking for papers that cited a paper I used the Citation Tab on the search box, rather than the identifier tab. The "Identifier" label isn't self-explanatory. search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting,citations other:Help files giving examples of common procedu own,online,webServices favourably It is well thought out, and provides access to papers which would otherwise be either difficult to find, or require trips to libraries. results,exercise 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 23:23:16 July 12 07- 12
48 other:sociology no no no T T T T T X T n 19 pdf,references,citing exaplanations own favourably 07- 12 July 12, 2002, 23:28:52 July 12 07- 12
49 other:life/health scientist no no I work professionally in the field of pharmacaology and molecular biology, but have an interest in broader, philosophical issues. T T T F N X F n twenty I didn't know how to do 2.4 and 2.5, and I didn't really understand the question in 2.6c.  For that, I just opened the reference at the end of the article. ranking,citing exaplanations online,webServices PubMed favourably exercise 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 0:49:46 July 13 07- 13
50 other:Cognitive Psychologist no no yes T T T T T X F y 17 The list downloads very slowly the first time. Searching multiple authors was not intuitive (I tried about 4 times before getting it right, and I had to consult the explanation link). search,ranking,pdf faster own,webServices PubMed, Psychoinfo favourably results,exercise Nice way to create a remote evaluation 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 1:01:46 July 13 07- 13
51 other:Medical, psychiatric, holistic medicine no yes Physician clinician, researcher of holistic medicine, spiritual awareness and healing N N N N N N N search,references,citing,cociting coverage own,online,offline,webServices medscape favourably 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 1:13:16 July 13 07- 13
52 other:psychiatrist no yes more space for fileds of interest T N N N N N N search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting coverage own,online,offline PubMed (Medline) unfavourably 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 8:24:48 July 13 07- 13
53 other:cognitive scientist no no yes In addition to CogPrints I am a heavy user of the CiteSeer ResearchIndex service.  The automatic citation linkage adds a lot of value to that service. T T T T T E T y 18 2.6c used search - but failed, so went back to the downloaded paper search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting coverage webServices CiteSeer favourably results,exercise 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 9:12:41 July 13 07- 13
54 other:psychologist occasionally alertsarXiv yes T F T T T X F n 10 ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting papers own PsycInfo favourably results 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 11:39:49 July 13 07- 13
55 other:BEHAVIORAL GENETICIST occasionally links yes N N N N N N N online WEB OF SCIENCE favourably results 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 17:38:34 July 13 07- 13
56 other:librarian occasionally regular yes T T F F T X F n 6 citing,cociting coverage online,offline ProQuest unfavourably results I will forward this survey to some faculty here at NYU to see how they like CitBasae. SF 07- 13 July 13, 2002, 21:37:20 July 13 07- 13
57 other:media specialist no yes T T T F T X N n 25 ranking exaplanations own,online,offline,webServices veryFovourably results,exercise 07- 14 July 14, 2002, 0:31:04 July 14 07- 14
58 other:cognitive scientist no no T T F N T N N >30 couldn't figure out 2.4 search,ranking,pdf,references,citing other:one example worked thru all the way own,online,webServices UCI electronic library favourably results took to long, slow loading, incomplete explanations of use 07- 14 July 14, 2002, 6:52:31 July 14 07- 14
59 computer no no T T T T T X N n 15 exercise is ok, although I did not want to download the pdf using a dial-up connection. ranking,citing,citations interface own,online,webServices choose results,exercise 07- 14 July 14, 2002, 9:15:56 July 14 07- 14
60 other:Neuroscientist no no yes N N N N N N N search,pdf,references,citing,cociting links online PubMed favourably 07- 14 July 14, 2002, 22:53:57 July 14 07- 14
61 infoScience no no yes arc T F T F T E T n 25 but my network was disrupted in the middle and I had to start up again search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting,citations coverage choose results,exercise 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 5:54:29 July 15 07- 15
62 other:psychologist no no N N N N N N N choose 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 10:28:58 July 15 07- 15
63 physicist occasionally web yes T T T F F N N 10 I could not go beyond question 2.3 inspite of entering the aoi identifier. ranking,citing,cociting exaplanations webServices favourably results,exercise 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 12:01:27 July 15 07- 15
64 other:Cognitive Scientist/Psychologist occasionally alertsServices yes other I AM USER AND AUTHOR of COGPRINTS N N N N N N N search papers offline favourably The citebase search page offers erroneus references. (e.g. The Search by VALIŅA, MĒ DOLORES in COGPRINTS found 1-8 papers. That is o.k., but the order of authors is erroneus in 3 papers and GLORIA SEOANE, co-author, is disapparead. See COGPRINTS: cog00001 results 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 12:05:47 July 15 07- 15
65 mathematician no yes N N N N N N N choose 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 14:26:36 July 15 07- 15
66 other:Biologist (Neuroscience) no no yes T T T T T E T n 4 A bit annoying, don't you think...? search,pdf,references,citing,cociting other:possibility to download selected referenceS own,online,offline,webServices was Reference Update, will probably become PubMed favourably results,exercise 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 15:07:18 July 15 07- 15
67 physicist no no yes N N N N N N N search,pdf papers favourably 07- 15 July 15, 2002, 21:05:20 July 15 07- 15
68 other:social science publisher no no yes T T T T T X T n 7 It took a while to figure out how to find the answer to 2.4; that part wasn't intuitive search,ranking,references,citing,cociting interface choose results 07- 16 July 16, 2002, 14:36:04 July 16 07- 16
69 physicist no yes F F F F F N N other:more intelligence choose 07- 16 July 16, 2002, 18:55:27 July 16 07- 16
70 N N N N N N N choose I took a look at this and liked the general approach.  As a music technologist, I found that there was little content of interest, however.  The boundaries of "science" are quite a big bibliographical problem . My student use PsychInfo, CiteSeer, and RILM   07- 16 July 16, 2002, 20:06:46 July 16 07- 16
71 infoScience no yes T T T T T E T n approx 10 own veryFovourably Once I had got my head around question 2.4 "Which is the most highly cited paper that cites the most-cited paper above?"- (I was attempting to do this via the search screen instead of using the data attached to the citation) then I was well away!

 results,exercise 07- 17 July 17, 2002, 8:55:52 July 17 07- 17
72 computer no yes T T T T T E T y 7 search,ranking,pdf coverage own,online Science Citation Index veryFovourably The good news is that the pdfs are there. results,exercise 07- 17 July 17, 2002, 17:04:35 July 17 07- 17
73 other:cognitive sciences no regular,links,web,library no T T T F T E T n 20 It is really easy to get use to it and seems to work well. The search engine is pretty fast. search,pdf,citing coverage online,offline pubmed veryFovourably results,exercise I really look forward to see your final version. 07- 17 July 17, 2002, 18:49:07 July 17 07- 17
74 T T T T T E F n 11 search papers own,online,webServices citeseer veryFovourably results 07- 18 July 18, 2002, 16:22:02 July 18 07- 18
75 infoScience occasionally no yes T T T F T E T n 10 A pity that the references weren't extracted from the eprint. The RefLinks in the PDF are great. search,pdf,references,citing,cociting coverage online,webServices current contents favourably results,exercise 07- 18 July 18, 2002, 19:57:34 July 18 07- 18
76 other:public health researcher no no F T T F F E T n 15 pdf,references coverage own choose results 07- 18 July 18, 2002, 20:23:14 July 18 07- 18
77 infoScience occasionally links,web,library yes T T T T T E T n 7 ranking,citations coverage online,webServices Inspec (direct SilverPlatter, not WoK) favourably results 07- 19 July 19, 2002, 13:06:45 July 19 07- 19
78 other:cognitive scientist no yes T T T T T E T n 5 ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting papers online,webServices pubmed choose very convincing 07- 19 July 19, 2002, 13:54:40 July 19 07- 19
79 infoScience occasionally web no T T T T T X T n 6 references,citing,cociting coverage own,online,offline STN unfavourably The subject coverage is too narrow.  Would need more engineering and chemistry coverage. results 07- 19 July 19, 2002, 21:11:21 July 19 07- 19
80 infoScience no no yes T T T T T E T n 10 pdf,citing,cociting online WoS favourably A bit confusing at first (the brown Abstract/ref list etc. links looked like titles at first on the paper's screen). I'd give more prominence to the ranking options on the search screen, as they're the thing that make this dataase particularly useful.   07- 19 July 19, 2002, 22:02:13 July 19 07- 19
81 other:aircraft no no myOAI N N N N N N N ranking exaplanations online favourably results,exercise 07- 20 July 20, 2002, 10:31:33 July 20 07- 20
82 other:philosopher occasionally links yes T T T N N E T n 3 I think it would be more accurate if the search engine would accept "string theory". In the current case, it seems that some papers irrelvant to string theory are retrieved, because they are relevant either to string or to theory. search,ranking,pdf,references,citing papers online,webServices veryFovourably Excellent. It would appreciate if it would includes more papers and other fields (logic, philosophy) results 07- 20 July 20, 2002, 12:13:56 July 20 07- 20
83 other:biologist no no no F T T T T X N 5 ranking,citing coverage webServices medline unfavourably results 07- 22 July 22, 2002, 9:13:17 July 22 07- 22
84 other:Publisher no yes T T T T T N N choose 07- 22 July 22, 2002, 14:47:09 July 22 07- 22
86 infoScience occasionally web no T T T T T E T n 10 Question 2.5 is a bit ambiguous - are you referring to the title in 2.4 or 2.3? search,pdf,references,citing,cociting exaplanations own,online,offline favourably The Co-citation section is a great idea, right now no one else I know has it. I think, however, that for the explanations for the Top 5, you should explain what they are the top 5 for. I am assuming they were the most cited as well, but I that info wasn't results,exercise 07- 22 July 22, 2002, 17:43:20 July 22 07- 22
87 other:Academic Librarian no yes T T T T T E T n 10 search,ranking,references,citing,cociting coverage veryFovourably 07- 22 July 22, 2002, 19:31:02 July 22 07- 22
88 other:Librarian no yes F N F N N N N choose 07- 22 July 22, 2002, 21:49:08 July 22 07- 22
89 other:Librarian no yes T T T T T E T n 7 search,pdf,references,citing,cociting exaplanations own favourably 07- 22 July 22, 2002, 22:00:07 July 22 07- 22
90 other:librarian no no T N T T T E T n 8 minutes I wasn't sure how to find the answer to 2.2, checked the help section but must have missed something. ranking,pdf,citing,cociting other:most browsed graphic indicator online,offline,webServices ISI web of science favourably results,exercise 07- 23 July 23, 2002, 14:17:20 July 23 07- 23
91 infoScience occasionally library yes T T T T T E T n 7 Easy to do & that usually means well thought out. search,ranking,pdf,citing coverage own,online,webServices favourably results,exercise 07- 23 July 23, 2002, 17:26:02 July 23 07- 23
92 infoScience no no yes T T T T T E T y 10 search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting,citations coverage own,online favourably results 07- 23 July 23, 2002, 19:44:07 July 23 07- 23
93 other occasionally web yes T T T T T E T n 4 Extremely informative, a good way to get people to learn about the handy features of the system. citing papers own veryFovourably results,exercise 07- 23 July 23, 2002, 20:12:45 July 23 07- 23
94 infoScience no yes T F T F T F N 25 Didn't find the title of the referenced paper citing exaplanations online LIta favourably results 07- 23 July 23, 2002, 21:04:53 July 23 07- 23
95 T T T T T E T n 7 ranking,citing,cociting,citations coverage online,webServices Web Of Science favourably results 07- 24 July 24, 2002, 14:00:03 July 24 07- 24
96 computer occasionally web,library no T T T T T E N n 7 ranking papers own,webServices favourably 07- 26 July 26, 2002, 7:08:36 July 26 07- 26
97 other:Biologist no no no N N N N N N N choose 07- 26 July 26, 2002, 17:33:43 July 26 07- 26
98 other:Biologist no no no N N N N N N N search papers own,online google search favourably results,exercise 07- 26 July 26, 2002, 17:35:35 July 26 07- 26
99 infoScience no no no N N N N N N N search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting,citations choose results 07- 28 July 28, 2002, 13:28:54 July 28 07- 28
100 other:Geomorphologist no no T T T T T F N n 8 Sadly, I wasn't able to download the pdf file of the article I found. pdf,references,citing coverage own,webServices favourably exercise 07- 30 July 30, 2002, 0:53:03 July 30 07- 30
101 computer no no T T T T T E T n 7 ranking,citing,cociting own,webServices http://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/Misc/HCI/in favourably 07- 30 July 30, 2002, 13:38:04 July 30 07- 30
102 computer occasionally web yes arc,kepler,myOAI T T T T T E T n 4 search,pdf,citing coverage choose 07- 30 July 30, 2002, 22:05:16 July 30 07- 30
103 other:Psychologist no yes T T F F N N N search,ranking,pdf online psychinfo silver platter favourably 07- 31 July 31, 2002, 0:28:51 July 31 07- 31
105 physicist no N N N N N N N choose 08- 02 August 02, 2002, 13:13:56 August 02 08- 02
106 physicist no N N N N N N F coverage choose 08- 02 August 02, 2002, 13:14:23 August 02 08- 02
107 other:Immunology no no no kepler N N N N N N N choose 08- 04 August 04, 2002, 21:06:56 August 04 08- 04
108 infoScience no no N N N N N N N choose 08- 05 August 05, 2002, 5:41:00 August 05 08- 05
109 other:Computer science and Brain science no yes myOAI T T T T T E T n 6 search,ranking,pdf,references,citing,cociting papers own,online,webServices PubMed veryFovourably The most important improve is online access to the full text. PubMed provides full text only for some journals. results 08- 08 August 08, 2002, 11:05:23 August 08 08- 08
110 infoScience no yes arc,myOAI T T T T T E T n 8 ranking,citing,cociting other:facilities to download references own,online Inspec choose Citebase needs OpenURL support exercise this is really well done as an evaluation.  I am impressed. 08- 12 August 12, 2002, 18:37:33 August 12 08- 12
111 computer occasionally web,library no T T T T T X T n 6 pdf papers online citeseer favourably 08- 20 August 20, 2002, 23:05:26 August 20 08- 20
112 physicist regularly alertsarXiv no T T T T T X T n 7.42 search,ranking,references,citing papers own favourably results 08- 21 August 21, 2002, 10:13:48 August 21 08- 21
113 physicist daily regular,links,web no T T T T T X T n 9 In 2.6a I gave the listed link; the actual link of the download was

http://ernie.ecs.soton.ac.uk/opcit/cgi-bin/pdf?id=oai%3AarXiv%3Ahep%2Dth%2F9711200		 ranking,cociting,citations coverage own,online,offline,webServices Web services veryFovourably Papers download with filename "pdf" only
 results,exercise 08- 21 August 21, 2002, 12:55:01 August 21 08- 21
114 other:Engineer no no T T T T T X T n 6 Is impressive and I will try in my own subject during the coming time. search,ranking,citing,cociting own,online,webServices choose 08- 21 August 21, 2002, 14:01:30 August 21 08- 21
115 physicist daily regular,alertsarXiv,links,web no T T T T T X F y 7 pdf,references coverage webServices hepdata favourably 08- 21 August 21, 2002, 15:16:19 August 21 08- 21
116 physicist regularly regular yes F T T T T X T n 7 Gave me a good impression of features - in particular the co-cited papers are a unique improvement. search,ranking,pdf,citing,cociting coverage own,online,webServices ISI Web of Science favourably The coverage is still too small to give me a reliable overview, especially in fields bordering and including engineering.

But the features that are implemented have impressed me tremendously.		 results 08- 21 August 21, 2002, 18:45:21 August 21 08- 21
117 physicist daily regular,links,web,library no